← Agent Learning knowledge insurance-dx review_required

Marine Cargo Sanctions Screening Checklist

무엇을 학습 Reusable underwriting and claims checklist for sanctions-aware marine cargo insurance triage. Use with [[2026-06-09]] daily learning note. Sanctions screening is not a one-time name check. In marine cargo it is a continu…
어디에 정리 03_Insurance_DX/Marine Cargo Sanctions Screening Checklist.md
앞으로 어떻게 쓸 것인가 검토 후 재사용 후보로 승격

Marine Cargo Sanctions Screening Checklist

Purpose

Reusable underwriting and claims checklist for sanctions-aware marine cargo insurance triage. Use with [[2026-06-09]] daily learning note.

Bottom line

Sanctions screening is not a one-time name check. In marine cargo it is a continuing underwriting control over who is insured, what is shipped, which vessel carries it, which ports/routes are used, which banks/payees are involved, and whether the insurer can lawfully bind, collect premium, issue certificates, pay claims, provide GA/salvage security, or pursue recovery.

Minimum intake facts

  • Insured / assured / beneficiary / loss payee.
  • Shipper, consignee, notify party, freight forwarder, carrier, charterer if known.
  • Vessel name and IMO number; flag; owner/operator/manager; prior names if high risk.
  • Cargo description, origin, destination, HS code if available, end-use/end-user where risk-sensitive.
  • Load, discharge, transshipment, storage, and diversion/substitute port rights.
  • Banks, payment currency, premium payer, claim payee, and any letter of credit parties where available.
  • Policy/certificate wording: sanctions clause, trade/territorial limits, war/strikes extension, cancellation/termination, claims cooperation.

Referral triggers

  • Sanctioned country/region/port/vessel/counterparty nexus.
  • Fuzzy match to SDN/consolidated sanctions list, alias, address, vessel IMO, owner, manager, or bank.
  • Vessel IMO missing, recent rename/reflag, AIS gaps, ship-to-ship transfer, unusual voyage deviation, or dark-fleet indicators.
  • Commodity is oil/petroleum, dual-use, military-adjacent, restricted technology, coal/metals, luxury goods, or other regime-sensitive cargo.
  • Open cover declaration lacks vessel/route/counterparty/payment data despite elevated country or commodity risk.
  • Request for claim payment, GA guarantee, salvage security, recovery action, return premium, or refund involving sanctions-sensitive parties.
  • Non-standard sanctions clause or unclear governing law — 검증 필요.

Decision workflow

  1. Separate facts from matches: record exact name/IMO/address/source and whether the hit is exact, fuzzy, alias, ownership/control, or geographic.
  2. Check transaction nexus: identify applicable regimes by insurer location, insured/counterparty nationality, currency/banks, route, cargo, and place of performance.
  3. Assess performance ability: can the insurer lawfully bind, accept premium, issue certificate, pay claim, issue guarantee/security, or appoint/pay surveyor/lawyer?
  4. Escalate unresolved cases: compliance/legal review before bind/payment/guarantee where sanctions status, ownership/control, license, or clause wording is unresolved.
  5. Retain evidence: store timestamped screening output, data sources, analyst decision, assumptions, and approval authority.

Coverage / wording questions

  • Is the clause framed as exclusion, limitation, illegality/non-performance, cancellation, or condition precedent?
  • Does it apply to premium receipt, claims payment, return premium, defence costs, GA/salvage security, sue and labour, and recovery actions?
  • Does war/strikes or political risk wording create separate sanctions-sensitive obligations?
  • Is there any territory/trade warranty or route restriction independent of sanctions law?
  • Does the policy require the insured to provide documents and updated voyage/counterparty information?

AI/DX automation candidate

Build a sanctions-aware declaration triage module that:

  • normalizes entity names, vessel IMO, aliases, addresses, and prior vessel names;
  • integrates approved sanctions screening tools and stores timestamped evidence;
  • flags fuzzy matches, ownership/control uncertainty, high-risk ports/routes, and sensitive commodities;
  • maps the issue to underwriting action: quote hold, certificate hold, referral, decline, cancellation review, claim payment hold, or GA/security escalation;
  • produces a memo with facts / inference / assumptions / recommendations / 검증 필요 sections.

The module must not autonomously approve bind, claim payment, GA guarantee, or sanctions clearance.

Source pointers

Related notes

  • [[2026-06-09]]
  • [[Russia Oil Price Cap Sanctions Underwriting Checklist]]

Study Room

내일 학습·스터디 큐

내일 학습 큐가 아직 추출되지 않았습니다.

스터디 대화

코칭뿐 아니라 학습 내용에 대해 에이전트별 토론·스터디 지시를 남기는 공간입니다. 저장된 메시지는 다음 학습 큐 조정의 근거가 됩니다.

아직 스터디 대화가 없습니다.

인사이트로 Second Brain에 저장

스터디 대화와 approved 큐를 원문 덤프가 아닌 Phillip의 큐레이션 인사이트 노트로 승격합니다.